Current Issue Archives Search Chapter Home Editor
The Loma Prietan
November 2000

Sierra Club Endorses Gore

Media contact: Allen Mattison, 202-675-7903

For Immediate Release July 22, 2000


SIERRA CLUB: ELECT AL GORE; CLEAN UP AMERICAN POLITICS

WASHINGTON - The Sierra Club today endorsed Vice President Al Gore to be the next President of the United States.

The Sierra Club Board of Directors also voted today to clean up American politics by: including serious third party candidates, including Ralph Nader, in the Presidential debates; getting big money out of politics by closing loopholes in current campaign-finance laws; establishing effective spending limits; adopting public financing for Senate and congressional candidates; and supporting the free-television-time proposal developed by the Alliance for Better Campaigns.

"The Sierra Club endorses Vice President Gore because he is committed to cutting air and water pollution and protecting our nation's treasured forests and wildlands," said Dr. Robert Cox, Sierra Club's volunteer President. "As Vice President, Al Gore helped strengthen clean air health standards, sped clean up of Superfund toxic waste sites, reduced automobile tailpipe pollution, and protected America's spectacular landscapes. This is the kind of leadership the American people are seeking in our next President.

"Governor Bush, on the other hand, has said that if he's elected, he will weaken toxic-waste clean-up standards, allow oil drilling in the Arctic Refuge, and increase logging in National Forests," Cox continued. "When it comes to protecting our environment, Al Gore is by far our best shot at a President committed to a sustainable future, tested as a political leader, and qualified to lead America into the next century."

The Gore endorsement capped a 6-month process in which the grassroots organization surveyed each of its chapters and thousands of its volunteer leaders. Thirty-nine chapters, representing 413,854 members, favored a Gore endorsement; one chapter, with 3,006 members, supported an endorsement for Ralph Nader; 16 chapters, with 138,236 members, did not respond.

"When the Sierra Club asked our local chapters and thousands of volunteer leaders whether to endorse a Presidential candidate, the response was overwhelming: They want Al Gore in the White House, protecting America's environment," Cox said. "Our members believe that a vote for Gore is the best way to protect our families from pollution and safeguard our nation's landscapes for future generations to enjoy."

The Sierra Club Board of Directors recognized consumer-advocate Ralph Nader's record of work for the environment, but emphasized the urgency of defeating Texas Governor George Bush as an additional reason for endorsing Vice-President Gore.

"Our members looked at the records of all the candidates," said Cox. "We looked at their positions, their records, and their experience. Al Gore is our overwhelming choice."

The Sierra Club, with over 600,000 members, is the nation's oldest and largest grassroots environmental organization. The Board voted to endorse Vice President with 12 in favor, two against, and one abstention.

Resolution endorsing Gore:

"The Sierra Club endorses Al Gore for President of the United States. We will do everything in our power to help Mr. Gore win the presidency. Mr. Gore has a long history as an advocate for the environment and we look forward to his Presidency and a new beginning for strong environmental protection in this country."

Resolution on cleaning up politics:

"Working on the current election is not enough. The single-round, winner-take-all political process has problems. We support alternative electoral methods that better reflect the diversity of public opinion. We need to get big money out of politics by closing loopholes in current campaign finance laws, establishing effective spending limits, and adopting public financing for Senate and congressional candidates. We support the free television time proposal developed by the Alliance for Better Campaigns. It is unrealistic to believe that such changes can be accomplished in this election, which will be over in a few months. It's too large a job, and the time is too short.

"Important issues relating to globalization, trade agreements, democracy and the environment have been raised in a substantive way by Ralph Nader. Sierra Club supports many of Mr. Nader's environmental and campaign finance reform proposals. While the Sierra Club does not endorse Ralph Nader in this election, we believe that serious third party candidates, including Mr. Nader, should be included in presidential debates."

# # #

COMPARISON OF VICE PRESIDENT GORE AND GOVERNOR BUSH
ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES


ISSUE: TOXIC POLLUTION

Gore:
  • Expanded Community Right to Know program requiring companies to report toxic chemical emissions.
  • Sped up and increased Superfund cleanups.
Bush:
  • Seeks to weaken Superfund cleanups.
  • Texas leads the nation in injecting toxic waste into underground wells, disposing 60% more toxic waste into injection wells than any other state.

ISSUE: CLEAN AIR

Gore:
  • Strengthened soot and smog clean-air health-standards, fighting legal challenges to those protections.
  • Adopted strictest ever emissions standards for cars, SUVs and light trucks.
  • Required elimination of 90% of sulfur from gasoline.
  • Called on power plants to cut their air pollution and global warming emissions.
  • Proposed slashing sulfur levels in diesel fuel.
Bush:
  • Texas leads the U.S. in toxic industrial air pollution, but Bush chose not to require outdated facilities to clean up.
  • Texas state officials sought to weaken Clean Air Act.
  • Houston passed Los Angeles last year as America's smoggiest city.
  • When came to office in 1995, cancelled auto emissions testing program in Houston.

ISSUE: CLEAN WATER

Gore:
  • Expanded funding for clean water programs.
  • Proposed slashing arsenic levels in drinking water.
Bush:
  • Proposed weakening Texas clean-water standards.
  • Texas leads the U.S. in violation of clean water discharge standards.

ISSUE: PROTECT WILD LANDS

Gore:
  • Has a stronger position than the Administration on protecting roadless, wild areas of our National Forests. Called for an end to all logging in those unspoiled places and immediate protection for the Tongass National Forest in Alaska.
  • Enacted the California Desert Protection Act, largest public lands protection bill ever in the lower 48 states.
  • Opposes drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
  • Created or expanded 10 new National Monuments to protect landscapes threatened by development.
  • Reduced logging in National Forests by 80% since 1993.
  • Extended offshore oil leasing moratorium in California and Florida for 10 years.
  • Proposed Lands Legacy Initiative.
  • Supports expanding the Land and Water Conservation Fund.
Bush:
  • Seeks to increase logging in National Forests.
  • Would allow oil companies to drill in Arctic Refuge.
  • Aims to reverse President Clinton's plan to protect wild, roadless National Forest areas.
  • Opposes newly created National Monuments.
  • Supports funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund.

ISSUE: CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM

Gore:
  • Supports McCain-Feingold bill to ban soft-money donations to political parties.
  • Supports quasi-public financing of Congressional elections.
Bush:
  • Opposes McCain-Feingold reforms.
  • Opposes public financing of elections.